In order to reduce the likelihood of this undesirable outcome, the service provider could, in the previous hypothetical, have characterized the separation clause in such a way as to express the intention that the inflation adjustment would be considered inseparable in the agreement. This objective could be achieved by a large number of other formulas, including the reformulation of the clause as follows: “If a provision of this agreement is declared illegal or unenforceable in the context of a judicial proceeding, this provision will be dissociated and inoperative and, provided that the fundamental conditions of the agreement (including but not limited to the section [the inflation adjustment provision] and the addition of other irrevering provisions)) are legally and enforceable. , the remainder of this agreement remains effective and binding on the parties.” 9 In general, this provision provides that any provision of the contract considered unenforceable (. B for example, for indeterminacy, illegality or otherwise) is taken into account, the rest of the contract remaining intact. Even if a court may (or may not) decide to separate a non-applicable provision, regardless of the existence or absence of a deterrence clause7, the inclusion of the clause may prompt a court to consider the non-applicable provision to be separable from the rest of the contract.8 The above example is however incomplete. If Mr. X buys a computer, scanner, printer and office as part of a package, with the explicit consent that all parts must be delivered together, the non-delivery of the printer may constitute a substantial violation of the entire contract. In general, a duly developed integration clause (also known as a global contract clause or merger clause) in a written contract will encourage a court to disrepair evidence of prior agreements or conditions (or at the same time), whether consistent or inconsistent, under this contract.6 The general purpose and usefulness of the integration clause are, among other things, consistent or inconsistent. , to prevent an angry party from circumventing its obligations by entering into previous agreements: which are in conflict with or succeed the written agreement. This is generally a useful provision that must be included in a written agreement. However, there are ambush hazards associated with the reckless application of unrefined building component integration clauses.
Under contract law, a dissociable contract is a contract that effectively consists of several separate contracts between the same parties, so that the omission of a part of such a “separable” contract is not contrary to the entire contract.